Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01785
Original file (BC 2014 01785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01785

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one 
Bronze Service Star (SAEMR, w 1BSS).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was awarded both ribbons and has at least one of his actual 
targets as proof.

He believes the Board should consider his untimely application in 
the interest of justice because he served his country for six 
years and was honorably discharged.  He is a Gulf War veteran and 
feels this was a clerical error.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 10 Mar 87, the applicant initially entered the Regular Air 
Force.

On 9 Mar 93, the applicant was released from active duty and was 
credited with six years of active service.   


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no official 
documentation in the applicant's personnel records verifying he 
qualified as expert with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun to 
be eligible for award of the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon 
with one Bronze Service Star.  To grant relief would be contrary 
to the criteria established by DoDM 1348.33, Secretary of the Air 
Force, Chief of Staff, and/or the War Department.

The Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon is awarded to all United 
States Air Force members who after 1 Jan 63, qualify as "expert" 
in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue 
handgun.  Qualification as "expert" in both weapons after 22 Jun 
72 shall be denoted by a bronze service star worn on the service 
ribbon.

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 1 Dec 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2014-01785 in Executive Session on 26 Feb 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member



The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01785 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 21 Apr 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Pertinent Excerpts from Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 16 Jun 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Dec 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03108

    Original file (BC 2014 03108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on his dates in Vietnam, DPSID was able to verify he is authorized two Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to the VSM for his participation in the Vietnam Defensive Campaign and Vietnam Air Campaign. Campaign streamers are embroidered swallow-tailed ribbons of the same design as campaign or service medals awarded to members for service in a named campaign. Based on review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, DPSID was able to determine that the below Air Force Medals and/or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03611

    Original file (BC 2014 03611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03611 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the following awards and ribbons: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00783

    Original file (BC 2014 00783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00783 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and Bronze Service Star (BSS) device on his Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). The applicant’s DD Form 214, reflect the award of the following Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02691

    Original file (BC 2014 02691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02691 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the following awards and ribbons: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01647

    Original file (BC 2014 01647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Good Conduct Medal is awarded to enlisted members who have honorably completed three continuous years of active military service subsequent to 26 August 1940, and who are recommended by their commanding officers for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity. The applicant’s dates of service are after the awarding dates for award of the Good Conduct Medal. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01551

    Original file (BC 2014 01551.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01551 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the award of the Kosovo Campaign Medal (KCM) and the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR) with one Bronze Service Star. The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects the award of the following Air Force Medals and/or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05391

    Original file (BC 2012 05391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the SAEMR indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who after, 1 Jan 63, qualified as “expert” in small...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04499

    Original file (BC 2013 04499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 1963, qualify as "expert" in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the SAEMR. Upon final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04546

    Original file (BC 2013 04546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04546 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02499

    Original file (BC 2014 02499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02499 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to include the award of the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: a. The applicant’s DD Form 214 and subsequent DD Form 215s reflect the award of the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: - National Defense...